So much of this quote rings true for me, including the idea that failure is death. I think this is one of the reasons that I hesitate so often with my own writing. I write and hide away what I've created, but I don't share it, and as I've mentioned before, after a while I lose faith in it."The truly creative mind in any field is no more than this: a human creature born abnormally, inhumanly sensitive. To him a touch is a blow, a sound is a noise, a misfortune is a tragedy, a joy is an ecstasy, a friend is a lover, a lover is a god, and failure is death. Add to this cruelly delicate organism the overpowering necessity to create, create, create - so that without the creating of music or poetry or books or buildings or something of meaning, his very breath is cut off from him. He must create, must pour out creation. By some strange, unknown, inward urgency, he is not really alive unless he is creating."
--Pearl Buck
There's this story of a writer who worked on the first three pages of a draft, crumpled them up and threw them away, convinced the story wasn't going anywhere. He was married with two young children. Bills were paid but things were tight. Reading about his job is enough to make one's stomach turn. He worked for a laundry company where soiled linens were shipped. He talked about unsavory insects and bodily fluid. But he worked to pay the bills for his family and dreamed of putting it behind him one day. He gave up on those three pages, but his wife found them and read them. She encouraged him to keep going. She believed there was something in that story. That story was Carrie, and it's safe to say its publication launched Stephen King's career.
I've read his book On Writing countless times. Some days I pick it up and let it fall open, joining the conversation in medias res. Sometimes I go to page one and start over or flip through to some of the underlined bits. I always find something to remind me of why I care so much about putting the words to the page. King stated, "Writing is a lonely job. Having someone who believes in you makes a lot of difference. They don't have to make speeches. Just believing is usually enough."
There are hundreds of amazing stories out there, sitting on shelves. There's also a lot of stuff that isn't as amazing. Everyone has their own personal preferences, and books are meant for enjoyment. So if you enjoy reading a book, do so. But storytelling is an art, and some are better at it than others. I'm talking about the differences between something like Rowling's Harry Potter series (which I would rank amazing) versus Meyer's Twilight series. I've read both series, start to finish. I picked up the first book in each for the same reason: to see what all the fuss/buzz was about.
In the case of Rowling, I was immediately transported into a world of fantasy and wonderful storytelling. The books were geared toward children, but readers of all ages were swept into Harry's adventures. I stayed up late reading them, devouring chapters. I cried when certain characters met their end.
On the flip side, I read the Twilight series begrudgingly. I read it so that I could discuss the entire series, because so many people told me that I had to read the whole thing, because the story got so much better. In my opinion, it did not. There were a lot of things I took issue with in Meyer's work, but I won't go into that now. The point is, I'd definitely consider it less-than-amazing.
But in both cases, and with King's crumpled pieces of his Carrie manuscript, someone believed in the story. All three works have gone on to become pop culture references, and more often than not, even if people haven't read the books, they are familiar with the concepts. All because someone other than the writer believed in the story that was being told.
Trouble is I’m so exhausted
The plot, you see, I think I’ve lost it
I need the grace to find what can’t be found
Long Lost Brother, Over the Rhine